Individual or Group Submission31/10/24

Will

Will suggests prioritising localised history in curriculum, encouraging teachers to undergo self-decolonisation, and supporting Aboriginal students to share their stories in an unreserved way. They recognise the primary dualistic method of teaching (subject-object, teacher-student) can be oppressive, hindering critical thinking and individual insight.

Topics: Education, First Nations history in education

Submission Transcription

How could First Peoples’ history and culture be better taught at school?

Local battles and massacres need to be given teaching preference over specific battles from other countries and regions. It is baffling that these atrocities were committed and are not acknowledged in history classes. There could be a mechanism in the curriculum that allows a case study localised to the region. Teachers should undergo a process of self-decolonising, at least recognising their own history before they teach it. Perhaps a lesson where children investigate their history, and find out if for example, their family played a more active role in displacement/subjugation than they previously thought. Aboriginal students could be supported to tell their story in an unreserved way.

How could Aboriginal kids be better supported at school?

I have heard anecdotes of Aboriginal students being made to wait outside classrooms, while whitewashed lessons on their own history are taught inside. This needs to stop, and the lessons restructured to be more inclusive and less prescriptive.

How else could we improve the Victorian education system for First Peoples?

Recognising that the primary dualistic method of teaching (subject-object, teacher-student) can be inherently oppressive to all children, let alone First Peoples. The delivery of content which must often be taken at face value, and those who question it are seen as troublesome, creates problems when it comes to critical thinking and individual insight from investigation.

/  0
100%
Loading PDF…

Truth-teller consent

First Peoples who make submissions to Yoorrook have provided their consent for the Commission to use their submission for the purposes of conducting Yoorrook’s work. Ownership of First Peoples’ submissions remains with the author of the submission. Their permission may be required to use their submission for any other purposes.
Read more about indigenous data sovereignty

Contact us about this submission

People who provided evidence to Yoorrook have full control over their own data and how it is used.
Contact us if you’d like to discuss this submission.
Contact us

Similar submissions

Explore submissions from other witnesses that discuss similar topics.

Individual or Group SubmissionIndividual or Group Submission

Lisa Kelly

Lisa Kelly's submission details her family background as a 5th generation Australian with ancestors from Ireland, Scotland, England, and Dutch-Burgher... more

Individual or Group SubmissionIndividual or Group Submission

Christine Godfrey

Christine Godfrey says their knowledge of colonisation and its impacts on First Peoples is patchy and that we have not been taught that systemic racis... more

Individual or Group SubmissionIndividual or Group Submission

Anonymous 1491

The author decided to make this submission as they believe their early education and experiences would mirror those of many other non-Indigenous Austr... more

Individual or Group SubmissionIndividual or Group Submission

Anonymous 1481

The author has a broad understanding of colonisation’s impact on First Peoples but feels Victoria's education system was extremely limited in teaching... more

Take Action

Explore ways to take action and connect with organisations supporting truth and justice.